no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then unzip
the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
------------------------------
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
*Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
> > differentiate.
> >
> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
> Previuosly it was
> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
> -- drools-guvnor.war
>
> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>
> Mark
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
> >
> >
> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
> >> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
> >> mistake or intended?
> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
> > another archive.
> >
> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
> >
> > What do people want?
> >
> > Mark
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jervis
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-dev mailing list
> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
--
Michael D Neale
home:
www.michaelneale.net
blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev