11:11 a.m.
Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
mistake or intended?
Cheers,
Jervis
12:15 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war
in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
another archive.
Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
What do people want?
Mark
Cheers,
Jervis
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
12:18 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war
in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
another archive.
Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
What do people want?
Mark
Cheers,
Jervis
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
12:25 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
I agree. However I'd prefer the maven notation: <artifact>-<version>,
so this very file would be called:
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.war
On 05/08/2010, at 12:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you
can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default
> url
> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
> mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it.
As
a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
another archive.
Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
What do people want?
Mark
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Bruno Unna
Public key available
12:38 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 11:25, Bruno Unna wrote:
I agree. However I'd prefer the maven
notation:<artifact>-<version>,
so this very file would be called:
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.war
I think the naming is related to how maven assemblies
produce their
format, will need to double check. We might be able to remove the
"assembly" name from the file.
Mark
On 05/08/2010, at 12:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
> differentiate.
>
> I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
>
> On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default
>> url
>> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> mistake or intended?
> Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it.
> As
> a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
> another archive.
>
> Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
> we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>
> What do people want?
>
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Bruno Unna
Public key available
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
12:40 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you
can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it
was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
> mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
another archive.
Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
What do people want?
Mark
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
12:47 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know tripped
me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web context or
rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
> differentiate.
>
> I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
>
> On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
>> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> mistake or intended?
> Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
> a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
> another archive.
>
> Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
> we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>
> What do people want?
>
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
12:59 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I
know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the
web context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
<mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
I like the new format - I like version numbers in
filenames so
you can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at deployment time
if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war
wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back
to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but the war
isn't....
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf
Of Mark Proctor
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedas
drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named
as
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to
change the
default url
> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor.
Is this a
> mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that had an
unversioned war in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed pointless
compressing it
in
another archive.
Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping
the version. Or
we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of
the .zip.
What do people want?
Mark
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
1:05 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then unzip
the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
------------------------------
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
*Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
> > differentiate.
> >
> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
> Previuosly it was
> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
> -- drools-guvnor.war
>
> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>
> Mark
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
> >
> >
> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
> >> mistake or intended?
> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
> > another archive.
> >
> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
> >
> > What do people want?
> >
> > Mark
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jervis
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-dev mailing list
> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
1:25 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 12:06
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and
then unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory...
confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles
for OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this
(but want to set the web context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
<mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael
(M.) wrote:
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Proctor
> On 05/08/2010 10:11,
Jervis Liu
wrote:
> Users can just rename the .war if they
like, stripping the version. Or
> What do people want?
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
I like the new format - I like version
numbers in filenames so
you can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at
deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the
contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I
can move back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but
the war isn't....
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1
war file is now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now named as
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way
users have to change the
default url
> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor.
Is this a
> mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that
had an unversioned war in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed
pointless compressing it
in
> another archive.
we can change it back to placing hte
.war inside of the .zip.
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
1:48 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
thankfully it didn't do that...
but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough enough times
that I still remember it.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
------------------------------
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
*Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then unzip
the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
> So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>
> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
> namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
> tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
> context or rename when deploying !).
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
>
>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
>> > differentiate.
>> >
>> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
>> Previuosly it was
>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>
>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
>> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>>
>> Mark
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
>> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> >> mistake or intended?
>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
>> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
>> > another archive.
>> >
>> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>> >
>> > What do people want?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Jervis
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
2:13 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing list
for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
Mark
On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
thankfully it didn't do that...
but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough enough
times that I still remember it.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<manstis1(a)ford.com <mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf Of
*Michael Neale
*Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip,
and then unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor
directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<manstis1(a)ford.com <mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf
Of *Michael Neale
*Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X
users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do
this (but want to set the web context or rename when
deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
<mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>
wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> I like the new format - I like version numbers
in filenames so you can
> differentiate.
>
> I can always change the web-context at
deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war
wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I can move
back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but the war
isn't....
Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] On
Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
>
> On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
named as
>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to
change the default url
>> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> mistake or intended?
> Previously it was a versioned zip that had an
unversioned war in it. As
> a war is already compressed it seemed pointless
compressing it in
> another archive.
>
> Users can just rename the .war if they like,
stripping the version. Or
> we can change it back to placing hte .war inside
of the .zip.
>
> What do people want?
>
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
2:32 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war fileis nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
It's something I understand - think how dangerous I'd be with knowledge
;-)
Not quite the same calibre as Wolfgang and his comments on Slot Specific
and Refraction... yet.
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
Sent: 05 August 2010 13:14
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war fileis
nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
Mark
On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
thankfully it didn't do that...
but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me
enough enough times that I still remember it.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
<manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 12:06
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
no I think it was more that OS-X finder
would unzip the zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
Distributing it as a war makes sense.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis,
Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com> wrote:
So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip
then?
(Says he with little experience of maven
packaging)
________________________________
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
yeah zipping the war sometimes caused
hassles for OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do
this (but want to set the web context or rename when deploying !).
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark
Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael
(M.) wrote:
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Proctor
> On 05/08/2010 10:11,
Jervis Liu
wrote:
> Users can just rename the .war if they
like, stripping the version. Or
> What do people want?
> Mark
>> Cheers,
>> Jervis
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
I like the new format - I like version
numbers in filenames so
you can
differentiate.
I can always change the web-context at
deployment time if I like.
Previuosly it was
drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
-- drools-guvnor.war
So the zip was versioned, just the
contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
the point in zipping a single war. But I
can move back to that, so the
main download artifact is versioned, but
the war isn't....
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1
war file is now namedas
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war
file is now named as
> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way
users have to change the
default url
> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor.
Is this a
> mistake or intended?
Previously it was a versioned zip that
had an unversioned war in it. As
a war is already compressed it seemed
pointless compressing it
in
> another archive.
we can change it back to placing hte
.war inside of the .zip.
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
12:22 a.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
hahaha...
to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a few
hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
list for
a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
Mark
On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
thankfully it didn't do that...
but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough enough
times that I still remember it.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then
> unzip the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses
> people.
>
> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1(a)ford.com>wrote:
>
>> So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>
>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
>> rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
>> namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
>> tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
>> context or rename when deploying !).
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org>wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>>> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
>>> > differentiate.
>>> >
>>> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
>>> Previuosly it was
>>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>>
>>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't
see
>>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
>>> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
>>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default
>>> url
>>> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>>> >> mistake or intended?
>>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it.
>>> As
>>> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
>>> > another archive.
>>> >
>>> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
>>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>>> >
>>> > What do people want?
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Jervis
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing
listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
9:07 a.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
So the consensue is to use a name convention of
<artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
version of doc to the website?
Cheers,
Jervis
Michael Neale wrote:
hahaha...
to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a
few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
Mark
On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
> thankfully it didn't do that...
>
> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
> enough times that I still remember it.
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
> <manstis1(a)ford.com <mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>
> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf Of
> *Michael Neale
> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the
> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>
> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
> <manstis1(a)ford.com <mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>
> So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>
> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for
> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good
> thing to do this (but want to set the web context
> or rename when deploying !).
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> > I like the new format - I like version
> numbers in filenames so you can
> > differentiate.
> >
> > I can always change the web-context at
> deployment time if I like.
> Previuosly it was
> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
> -- drools-guvnor.war
>
> So the zip was versioned, just the contained
> .war wasn't. I didn't see
> the point in zipping a single war. But I can
> move back to that, so the
> main download artifact is versioned, but the
> war isn't....
>
> Mark
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
> file is now namedas
> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
> >
> >
> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is
> now named as
> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
> have to change the default url
> >> to things like
> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
> this a
> >> mistake or intended?
> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
> an unversioned war in it. As
> > a war is already compressed it seemed
> pointless compressing it in
> > another archive.
> >
> > Users can just rename the .war if they
> like, stripping the version. Or
> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
> inside of the .zip.
> >
> > What do people want?
> >
> > Mark
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jervis
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-dev mailing list
> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
12:55 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 06/08/2010 08:07, Jervis Liu wrote:
So the consensue is to use a name convention of
<artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
version of doc to the website?
We are doing a 5.1.1 next wednesday. All docs will
be updated then.
So you'll fix the maven assembly?
Mark
Cheers,
Jervis
Michael Neale wrote:
> hahaha...
>
> to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a
> few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
> list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>
> Mark
>
> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>> thankfully it didn't do that...
>>
>> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
>> enough times that I still remember it.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>
>> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf Of
>> *Michael Neale
>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the
>> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
>> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>>
>> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So,<artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>
>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for
>> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good
>> thing to do this (but want to set the web context
>> or rename when deploying !).
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>> > I like the new format - I like version
>> numbers in filenames so you can
>> > differentiate.
>> >
>> > I can always change the web-context at
>> deployment time if I like.
>> Previuosly it was
>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>
>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained
>> .war wasn't. I didn't see
>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can
>> move back to that, so the
>> main download artifact is versioned, but the
>> war isn't....
>>
>> Mark
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
>> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
>> file is now namedas
>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> now named as
>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
>> have to change the default url
>> >> to things like
>> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
>> this a
>> >> mistake or intended?
>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
>> an unversioned war in it. As
>> > a war is already compressed it seemed
>> pointless compressing it in
>> > another archive.
>> >
>> > Users can just rename the .war if they
>> like, stripping the version. Or
>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
>> inside of the .zip.
>> >
>> > What do people want?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Jervis
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
1:17 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
Mark Proctor wrote:
On 06/08/2010 08:07, Jervis Liu wrote:
> So the consensue is to use a name convention of
> <artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
> change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
> version of doc to the website?
>
We are doing a 5.1.1 next wednesday. All docs will be updated then.
So you'll fix the maven assembly?
I ll do that.
Mark
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> Michael Neale wrote:
>
>> hahaha...
>>
>> to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a
>> few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
>> list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>>
>>> thankfully it didn't do that...
>>>
>>> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
>>> enough times that I still remember it.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf Of
>>> *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the
>>> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
>>> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>>>
>>> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> So,<artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>>
>>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for
>>> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good
>>> thing to do this (but want to set the web context
>>> or rename when deploying !).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
>>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>>> > I like the new format - I like version
>>> numbers in filenames so you can
>>> > differentiate.
>>> >
>>> > I can always change the web-context at
>>> deployment time if I like.
>>> Previuosly it was
>>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>>
>>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained
>>> .war wasn't. I didn't see
>>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can
>>> move back to that, so the
>>> main download artifact is versioned, but the
>>> war isn't....
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
>>> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
>>> file is now namedas
>>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file
is
>>> now named as
>>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
>>> have to change the default url
>>> >> to things like
>>> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
>>> this a
>>> >> mistake or intended?
>>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
>>> an unversioned war in it. As
>>> > a war is already compressed it seemed
>>> pointless compressing it in
>>> > another archive.
>>> >
>>> > Users can just rename the .war if they
>>> like, stripping the version. Or
>>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
>>> inside of the .zip.
>>> >
>>> > What do people want?
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Jervis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
_______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
_______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>>> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
2:19 a.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
Correction.The name convention we currently used in Drools is
<drools>-<version>-<moduleName>. Guvnor should follow the same
convention I believe, so it should be drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war (same as
it is called right now). Nothing needs to be changed in assembly, I will
update doc.
Jervis
On 2010/8/6 15:07, Jervis Liu wrote:
So the consensue is to use a name convention of
<artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
version of doc to the website?
Cheers,
Jervis
Michael Neale wrote:
> hahaha...
>
> to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a
> few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
> list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>
> Mark
>
> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>> thankfully it didn't do that...
>>
>> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
>> enough times that I still remember it.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>
>> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf Of
>> *Michael Neale
>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the
>> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
>> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>>
>> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So,<artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>
>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>
>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for
>> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good
>> thing to do this (but want to set the web context
>> or rename when deploying !).
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>> > I like the new format - I like version
>> numbers in filenames so you can
>> > differentiate.
>> >
>> > I can always change the web-context at
>> deployment time if I like.
>> Previuosly it was
>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>
>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained
>> .war wasn't. I didn't see
>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can
>> move back to that, so the
>> main download artifact is versioned, but the
>> war isn't....
>>
>> Mark
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
>> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
>> file is now namedas
>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>> now named as
>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
>> have to change the default url
>> >> to things like
>> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
>> this a
>> >> mistake or intended?
>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
>> an unversioned war in it. As
>> > a war is already compressed it seemed
>> pointless compressing it in
>> > another archive.
>> >
>> > Users can just rename the .war if they
>> like, stripping the version. Or
>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
>> inside of the .zip.
>> >
>> > What do people want?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Jervis
>> >>
>> >>
>> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
2:23 a.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
but we don't wnat that name to be part of the URL when people deploy it to
their container of choice - so either they need to remember to rename it, or
the context name needs to be set (not sure if you can do that in a standard
war?).
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jervis Liu <jliu(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Correction.The name convention we currently used in Drools is
<drools>-<version>-<moduleName>. Guvnor should follow the same
convention I believe, so it should be drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war (same as
it is called right now). Nothing needs to be changed in assembly, I will
update doc.
Jervis
On 2010/8/6 15:07, Jervis Liu wrote:
> So the consensue is to use a name convention of
> <artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
> change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
> version of doc to the website?
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> Michael Neale wrote:
>> hahaha...
>>
>> to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head for a
>> few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>> This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev mailing
>> list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>>> thankfully it didn't do that...
>>>
>>> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
>>> enough times that I still remember it.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On Behalf
Of
>>> *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the
>>> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
>>> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>>>
>>> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1@ford.com<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> So,<artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>>>
>>> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for
>>> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a good
>>> thing to do this (but want to set the web context
>>> or rename when deploying !).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
>>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org
>>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.)
wrote:
>>> > I like the new format - I like version
>>> numbers in filenames so you can
>>> > differentiate.
>>> >
>>> > I can always change the web-context at
>>> deployment time if I like.
>>> Previuosly it was
>>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>>
>>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained
>>> .war wasn't. I didn't see
>>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can
>>> move back to that, so the
>>> main download artifact is versioned, but the
>>> war isn't....
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>]
>>> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
>>> file is now namedas
>>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file
is
>>> now named as
>>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
>>> have to change the default url
>>> >> to things like
>>> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
>>> this a
>>> >> mistake or intended?
>>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
>>> an unversioned war in it. As
>>> > a war is already compressed it seemed
>>> pointless compressing it in
>>> > another archive.
>>> >
>>> > Users can just rename the .war if they
>>> like, stripping the version. Or
>>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
>>> inside of the .zip.
>>> >
>>> > What do people want?
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Jervis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
_______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
_______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> >
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
>>> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
3:42 p.m.
New subject: Guvnor 5.1 war file is nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
On 2010/8/9 8:23, Michael Neale wrote:
but we don't wnat that name to be part of the URL when people
deploy it
to their container of choice - so either they need to remember to rename
it, or the context name needs to be set (not sure if you can do that in
a standard war?).
Ppl needs to rename it. I will doc this clearly in the installation
guide, hope this will help.
Jervis
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jervis Liu <jliu(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jliu@redhat.com>> wrote:
Correction.The name convention we currently used in Drools is
<drools>-<version>-<moduleName>. Guvnor should follow the same
convention I believe, so it should be drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war (same as
it is called right now). Nothing needs to be changed in assembly, I will
update doc.
Jervis
On 2010/8/6 15:07, Jervis Liu wrote:
> So the consensue is to use a name convention of
> <artifact>-<version>.war. I will update Guvnor doc to reflect this
> change. Mark, once I have the doc updated, do we need to upload a new
> version of doc to the website?
>
> Cheers,
> Jervis
>
> Michael Neale wrote:
>> hahaha...
>>
>> to be fair, that stupid OS-X "feature" made me scratch my head
for a
>> few hours once, thinking our build was doing something wrong...
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Mark
Proctor<mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>
>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>>
wrote:
>>
>> This is quite funny, the longest debate we've had on dev
mailing
>> list for a while, and it's about the naming of a jar :)
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 05/08/2010 12:48, Michael Neale wrote:
>>> thankfully it didn't do that...
>>>
>>> but not naming the folder drools-guvnor.war tripped me enough
>>> enough times that I still remember it.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1(a)ford.com
<mailto:manstis1@ford.com><mailto:manstis1@ford.com
<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ..and unzip the jars in WEB-INF\lib? ;-)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>] *On Behalf Of
>>> *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 12:06
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> nownamedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> no I think it was more that OS-X finder would
unzip the
>>> zip, and then unzip the war, and you end up with a
>>> drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.
>>>
>>> Distributing it as a war makes sense.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.)
>>> <manstis1(a)ford.com
<mailto:manstis1@ford.com><mailto:manstis1@ford.com
<mailto:manstis1@ford.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So,<artifact>-<version>.war without zip
then?
>>>
>>> (Says he with little experience of maven
packaging)
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Michael Neale
>>> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
>>> *To:* Rules Dev List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
file is
>>> now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>>
>>> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused
hassles for
>>> OS-X users (I know tripped me up) so its a
good
>>> thing to do this (but want to set the web
context
>>> or rename when deploying !).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
>>> <mproctor(a)codehaus.org <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>
>>> <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org
<mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael
(M.) wrote:
>>> > I like the new format - I like version
>>> numbers in filenames so you can
>>> > differentiate.
>>> >
>>> > I can always change the web-context at
>>> deployment time if I like.
>>> Previuosly it was
>>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>> -- drools-guvnor.war
>>>
>>> So the zip was versioned, just the
contained
>>> .war wasn't. I didn't see
>>> the point in zipping a single war. But
I can
>>> move back to that, so the
>>> main download artifact is versioned,
but the
>>> war isn't....
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org>>]
>>> On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>>> > To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war
>>> file is now namedas
>>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is
>>> now named as
>>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users
>>> have to change the default url
>>> >> to things like
>>> http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is
>>> this a
>>> >> mistake or intended?
>>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had
>>> an unversioned war in it. As
>>> > a war is already compressed it seemed
>>> pointless compressing it in
>>> > another archive.
>>> >
>>> > Users can just rename the .war if they
>>> like, stripping the version. Or
>>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war
>>> inside of the .zip.
>>> >
>>> > What do people want?
>>> >
>>> > Mark
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Jervis
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>>> >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> >>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
<http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> <http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
<http://www.michaelneale.net><http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>> <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org><mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael D Neale
>>> home: www.michaelneale.net
<http://www.michaelneale.net><http://www.michaelneale.net>
>>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com><http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org><mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org><mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael D Neale
>> home: www.michaelneale.net
<http://www.michaelneale.net><http://www.michaelneale.net>
>> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
<http://michaelneale.blogspot.com><http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net <http://www.michaelneale.net>
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com <http://michaelneale.blogspot.com>
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
5001
days inactive
5005
days old
19 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Anstis, Michael (M.) -
Bruno Unna -
Jervis Liu -
Mark Proctor -
Michael Neale