+1 for OWL
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Michael Neale <michael.neale(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Interesting - well I think there is interest in OWL, maybe RIF and
RuleML is still around, but the others - I haven't heard much?
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Xavier Breton <xavier.breton(a)acm.org>
> I'm looking for feedback, I'll develop a Semantic Web Drools Module that
> will be the subject of my Master Degree Tesis.
> The idea is to use Eclipse Modelling Framework (EMF) for prototyping and
> follow a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) where the source language is
> Semantic of Business Vocabularies and Business Rules (SBVR) and the
> language is Drools DRL.
> The mapping could be (PIM level):
> - Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL)
> - Ontology Web Language (OWL)
> - RuleML
> - Rule Interchange Format (RIF)
> - REWERSE Rule Markup Language (R2ML)
> It could be added to the module at the source UML or Entity Relationship
> like models to transform the models into SBVR.
> Xavier Breton
> rules-dev mailing list
Michael D Neale
rules-dev mailing list