Re: [rules-dev] Cell() PropertySpecific Behaviour

There was a brief discussion about annotation class names a few days ago - has this been finalized, and if so, what is the result? Thanks Wolfgang On 16 February 2012 18:26, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > We are just fine tuning PropertySpecific behahviour. > > Initially a pattern without any properties' mask was set to > LONG.MAX_VALUE so that it responded to any field changes. > > However we've now changed it to 0, so Cell() will respond to the initial > insertion, but it will not respond to any modifies. > > Should you want it to respond to modifies you must add @watch(*). > > The other aspect is that we are adding a kbuillder configration to set > the default behaviour. Currently it is off. With it defaulting to off > using PropertySpecific as an annotation makes sense. If we default it to > on you then need to use PropertySpecific(true). i.e. the reversing of > the logic means for the common case we now need an argument. Considering > this common case will become default at some point in the future, i.e. > you want the parameterless version to be the common use case. > NonPropertySpecific is a bit long :) > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev