I don't know how much Seam 3 momentum remains, but the sooner the better
for the sandbox.
On Jun 26, 2012 11:37 AM, "Jason Porter" <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release.
I'd keep
it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to
put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't
gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is
ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I
heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi
enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the
case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
> there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for
> a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike
> for any new features and ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
>
>> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
>> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>>
>> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> individual module releases as needed?
>>
>> -C
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/seam-dev<https://lists.jbos...
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev