1:55 a.m.
I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
1:57 a.m.
+1 to 3.1.1.Final.
Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the
Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
3:10 a.m.
+1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security
stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>wrote:
+1 to 3.1.1.Final.
Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
4:45 a.m.
Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
can release what we have?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the
security
stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
>
>
> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
> >
> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> > individual module releases as needed?
> >
> > -C
> > _______________________________________________
> > seam-dev mailing list
> > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
3:50 p.m.
Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about
the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and
stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)
ill try to reproduce and file a bug report
---
Lincoln Baxter's Droid
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
can release what we have?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the
security
> stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
>>
>>
>> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
>> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
>> >
>> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> > individual module releases as needed?
>> >
>> > -C
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > seam-dev mailing list
>> > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
6:32 p.m.
External module?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure
about
the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and
stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)
ill try to reproduce and file a bug report
---
Lincoln Baxter's Droid
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
> can release what we have?
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
> <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the
> > security
> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
> >>
> >>
> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>
> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the
> >> > Seam
> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
> >> >
> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> >> > individual module releases as needed?
> >> >
> >> > -C
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > seam-dev mailing list
> >> > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seam-dev mailing list
> >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lincoln Baxter, III
> > http://ocpsoft.org
> > "Simpler is better."
4:29 p.m.
Security has an external extensions module, which are additional
authentication integrations. I don't know much other than that about it.
-Dan
--
Sent from my CyanogenMod-powered
Android device, an open platform for
carriers, developers and consumers.
On Jun 22, 2012 10:33 AM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
External module?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure
about
> the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately
and
> stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)
>
> ill try to reproduce and file a bug report
>
> ---
> Lincoln Baxter's Droid
>
>
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
>> can release what we have?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
>> <lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the
>> > security
>> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <
gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
>> >>
>> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to
the
>> >> > Seam
>> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible
to
do
>> >> > individual module releases as needed?
>> >> >
>> >> > -C
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > seam-dev mailing list
>> >> > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> seam-dev mailing list
>> >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lincoln Baxter, III
>> > http://ocpsoft.org
>> > "Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
3:59 p.m.
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare
for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on
DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the
Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
4:35 p.m.
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is
ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I
heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi
enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the
case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for
Seam 3.x,
there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for
a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike
for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> ______________________________**_________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/seam-dev<https://lists.jbos...
>
5:37 p.m.
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the
3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the
idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they
are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS
is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS
was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit
a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's
an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we
should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing
development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
5:54 p.m.
+1 to the sandbox on Deltaspike
Enviado via iPhone
Em 26/06/2012, às 11:37, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release.
I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these
extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to
accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
>
> Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard
DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it
hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?
>
> -C
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release.
Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and
ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
9:22 p.m.
I don't know how much Seam 3 momentum remains, but the sooner the better
for the sandbox.
On Jun 26, 2012 11:37 AM, "Jason Porter" <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release.
I'd keep
it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to
put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't
gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is
ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I
heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi
enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the
case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
> there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for
> a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike
> for any new features and ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
>
>> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
>> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>>
>> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> individual module releases as needed?
>>
>> -C
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/seam-dev<https://lists.jbos...
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
11 p.m.
If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting sandbox added to
DeltaSpike.
+1 for that :)
On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release.
I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these
extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to
accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
>
> Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard
DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it
hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?
>
> -C
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release.
Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and
ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
11:56 p.m.
I see a lot of these emails simply going to seam-dev. Please please forward
or respond to deltaspike-dev as well (unless you need to be a member, in
that case they may bounce or wait to be allowed in).
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ove Ranheim <oranheim(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting
sandbox
added to DeltaSpike.
+1 for that :)
On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep
it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to
put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't
gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is
ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I
heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi
enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the
case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
> there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for
> a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike
> for any new features and ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
>
>> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
>> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>>
>> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> individual module releases as needed?
>>
>> -C
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/seam-dev<https://lists.jbos...
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
4321
days inactive
4326
days old
13 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Cody Lerum -
Dan Allen -
George Gastaldi -
Jason Porter -
Lincoln Baxter, III -
Ove Ranheim -
Shane Bryzak