On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 19:10, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'd rather keep everything related to a single module contained
single group. Having artifacts spread across multiple groups doesn't
seem tidy to me.
A lot of projects do this, including Weld and RichFaces. It helps people
understand what the core artifacts are and what are auxiliary things (in
this case examples). I don't think we need the breakdown that Weld does,
which is to have subpackages for each UI technology, but having an
"examples" folder does make a lot of sense, imho.
Plus, then the artifacts can be named like "rest-tasks" (in all,
org.jboss.seam.rest.examples:rest-tasks) <- feel free to revise that scheme.
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597