On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2011, at 18:46, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I've done some work to seam-parent already, removing weld-parent from
> the hierarchy, updating all the plugin versions and some general
> cleanup. I have a bunch of questions though, if anyone can answer any
> of these it will save me a lot of time:
>
> 1) Do we require both junit and testng?
I think most are using JUnit. I found ftests that use testng though.
> 2) Do we use mockito?
Not yet, don't think, but a good idea for quick testing in api or impl
> 3) We have a number of Weld dependencies: weld-api, weld-core, weld-se,
> weld-se-core, weld-servlet - where/how are these being used?
Got me on that one.
weld-core is used by weld-ee-embedded container. I would imagine that
weld-se-core would be used by weld-se-embedded container, possibly others
> 4) org.apache.openjpa:openjpa-all - what uses this?
Persistence testing with another provider?
> 5) org.hsqldb:hsqldb - do we use this?
Again, perhaps persistence does
> 6) org.subethamail:subethasmtp - where is this used?
Cody answered that
> 7) com.sun.jersey:jersey-bundle and
> com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-multipart - what are these/where are they
> used?
Glassfish testing with the remote 3.1 client
> 8) Container-related:
> org.jboss.jbossas:jboss-server-manager
> org.jboss.jbossas:jboss-as-client
> org.mortbay.jetty:jetty
> org.mortbay.jetty:jsp-2.1-jetty
> org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-naming
> org.mortbay.jetty:jetty-plus
> org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-webapp
> org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-plus
> org.glassfish.deployment:deployment-client
>
> - Are these dependencies here purely for testing purposes?
I would assume that's the case
> 9) There are two emma plugins - org.codehaus.mojo:emma-maven-plugin and
> org.sonatype.maven.plugin:emma4it-maven-plugin, do we need both?
> (actually, i think one is used for instrumentation, and one for
> reporting - can someone pls confirm this?)
Maybe we should look into the arquillian jocono (sp?) stuff instead.
I believe they are used as you describe Shane, but with the new testsuite
setup, I haven't confirmed whether their use within the modules works as it
used to, code coverage falls into that category as well. Definitely worth
looking at jocono.
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev