On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Matt Drees <matt.drees(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I really don't like this idea. I want to stick to the Maven standard
> src/main/webapp or use view. WebContext is a stupid folder name and I've
> always hated that WTP wouldn't change it to something less lame. Besides,
> the location is completely configurable in WTP anyway, so it doesn't really
> care what the folder is called. I've also seen Maven plugins choke when the
> convention is not followed. So I'm going to hack on src/main/webapp for a
> couple of days and just see how it pans out.
>
>
Did the src/main/webapp convention not pan out? I noticed you've committed
examples using the WebContent convention.
Personally, I'd rather see src/main/webapp, if possible.
That's what I'm using for Seam examples. I haven't touch the web beans
examples at this point. I want to just run with it in Seam and see how it
pans out. To make the switch is actually very simple from a configuration
standpoint.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.