I fat fingered a property in two of the seam-gen templates, which means that we are going to have to do an SP1 for Seam 2.1.0.GA. This issue affects any schema that has a grandparent relationship. For instance, Hole -> Course -> Facility. In the process of fixing this issue, we need to expand the vehicles schema that we use to test seam-gen so it has coverage for this relationship. Plans are to release it on Monday. There are a couple of other minor issues I want to roll in regarding executing seam on Windows. There are problems with spaces in the path and slashes on cgywin (oh how I love Windows scripts #$%). Open question. I have prepared project files for IntelliJ IDEA so you can point and click to get your project opened (rather than going through the rather tedious Eclipse import process). Should we add these to the SP1?

The IDEA project files are configured to activate the Seam features in IDEA 8. It's important for us to acknowledge the work that have done since Seam is their #1 feature for the upcoming release and that is just good publicity. -Dan -- Dan Allen Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention. _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

I fat fingered a property in two of the seam-gen templates, which means that we are going to have to do an SP1 for Seam 2.1.0.GA. This issue affects any schema that has a grandparent relationship. For instance, Hole -> Course -> Facility. In the process of fixing this issue, we need to expand the vehicles schema that we use to test seam-gen so it has coverage for this relationship. Plans are to release it on Monday. There are a couple of other minor issues I want to roll in regarding executing seam on Windows. There are problems with spaces in the path and slashes on cgywin (oh how I love Windows scripts #$%). Open question. I have prepared project files for IntelliJ IDEA so you can point and click to get your project opened (rather than going through the rather tedious Eclipse import process). Should we add these to the SP1? The IDEA project files are configured to activate the Seam features in IDEA 8. It's important for us to acknowledge the work that have done since Seam is their #1 feature for the upcoming release and that is just good publicity. -Dan -- Dan Allen Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention. _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > This is your last chance to get anything into this release :-) > The SP1 tag should be based on the GA tag with these revisions merged in: > r9399 (JBSEAM-3620, Excel, Daniel) > r9397, r9421, r9422 (JBSEAM-3618, pre EE5 compatibility, Pete) > r9390 (JBSEAM-3617, seam-gen, Dan) > r9401, r9405 (JBSEAM-3585, seam-gen, Dan) Also include r9400 or else the 9405 won't apply correctly. > Dan, Daniel, please verify that all the commits you made for these issues > were correctly tagged with the issue number/verify that the revisions above > represent the entire fix. I'm assuming we can check them once the tag is cut? > We can just spot-test this release - excel example; jpa example on jboss and > on tomcat6 and booking example on JBoss; seam-gen. > Pete -- Dan Allen Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention.

Jay Balunas napsal(a): > When the tag is updated and ready for testing let me know - Marek > will be performing the spot tests for this release. > > -Jay > > ----- "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > >> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> This is your last chance to get anything into this release :-) >>> The SP1 tag should be based on the GA tag with these revisions >>> >> merged in: >> >>> r9399 (JBSEAM-3620, Excel, Daniel) >>> r9397, r9421, r9422 (JBSEAM-3618, pre EE5 compatibility, Pete) >>> r9390 (JBSEAM-3617, seam-gen, Dan) >>> r9401, r9405 (JBSEAM-3585, seam-gen, Dan) >>> >> Also include r9400 or else the 9405 won't apply correctly. >> >> >>> Dan, Daniel, please verify that all the commits you made for these >>> >> issues >> >>> were correctly tagged with the issue number/verify that the >>> >> revisions above >> >>> represent the entire fix. >>> >> I'm assuming we can check them once the tag is cut? >> >> >>> We can just spot-test this release - excel example; jpa example on >>> >> jboss and >> >>> on tomcat6 and booking example on JBoss; seam-gen. >>> Pete >>> >> -- >> Dan Allen >> Software consultant | Author of Seam in Action >> >> http://mojavelinux.com >> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >> >> NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a >> daily >> basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away >> from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more >> than a >> week, >> it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message >> was >> caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a >> message >> if >> you feel that it did not reach my attention. >> > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > I verified seam-gen (EAR, WAR) on JBoss-as 4.2.3 and used java5 runtime, examples (jpa, booking, excel) on jboss-as 4.2.3 and tomcat6.0.18. All worked fine. Jozef will help me with seam-gen on cygwin (windows). -- Marek Novotny -- JBoss Seam Product Lead Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Purkynova 99 612 45 Brno Email: mnovotny(a)redhat.com Office phone: +420 532 294 287, ext. 82-62 087 mobile: +420 608 509 230 _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Pete Muir wrote: > We need to do this release yesterday, so I think Norman you should > go ahead and do the build/release... Ok. Should I make everything active tonight or wait for the morning?

On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:34 AM, Dan Allen wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> This is your last chance to get anything into this release :-) >> The SP1 tag should be based on the GA tag with these revisions >> merged in: >> r9399 (JBSEAM-3620, Excel, Daniel) >> r9397, r9421, r9422 (JBSEAM-3618, pre EE5 compatibility, Pete) >> r9390 (JBSEAM-3617, seam-gen, Dan) >> r9401, r9405 (JBSEAM-3585, seam-gen, Dan) > > Also include r9400 or else the 9405 won't apply correctly. I've created the new tag and merged each of these. Let me know if we need any other changes in.