+1 to the sandbox on Deltaspike
Enviado via iPhone
Em 26/06/2012, às 11:37, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release.
I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also
need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these
extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to
accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
>
> Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard
DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it
hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?
>
> -C
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
> We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x,
there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release.
Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and
ongoing development.
>
> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev