We're pathetic. Between now and the next hudson run probably ten of us
will fix a test. Just so some day we can stand around in a corner and
take one sip each from a beer. ;)
Ales Justin wrote:
That's not fair.
Scott deliberately hacked crucial piece of profileservice in order to
get to the beer.
:-)
Scott Stark wrote:
> A few of the profileservice tests were fixed by restoring the
> SARDeployer ServiceMetaDataICF that was lost in the bootstrap.xml
> refactoring:
>
> commit -m "JBAS-5625, restore the SARDeployer ServiceMetaDataICF to
> obtain management interfaces from the mbean annotation element"
> /Users/svn/JBossHead/jboss-head/server/src/etc/conf/default/deployers.xml
> Sending
> /Users/svn/JBossHead/jboss-head/server/src/etc/conf/default/deployers.xml
> Transmitting file data ...
> Committed revision 74488.
>
> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>> The AS5 testsuite is a bit over 100 failures. This is actually the
>> best score we've seen in the past few years in AS trunk.
>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-Test...
>>
>>
>> Can we make a push to get below that psychological limit?
>>
>> Try to fix some tests by coordinating through this base JIRA here:
>>
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-4635
>>
>> The first one to make it below 100 will get a beer or something :)
>>
>> Merci
>> /Dimitris
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com