We don't have CI. Something I've been bitching about for some time.
I agree completely that each commit must be automatically tested through
each integration suite.
Carlo
On 01/12/2010 04:02 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Am I wrong in thinking that these naming commits were introduced to
trunk/ (because Hudson caught it)? If so, you really can't be
introducing errors like this. Such fundamental changes need to go
through the automated test cycle before they are committed. Otherwise
you're going to screw up everybody else that is working off of trunk.
Especially considering every "maven install" that is done pulls in new
snapshots.
Ales Justin wrote:
> Yes, like I told you n-times, the api for scoped stuff is poor atm. ;-)
> To get around this, we used unique name and "real" alias via @Aliases
> annotation.
>
> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>
>> Hmm, BeanMetaDataDeployer.undeploy doesn't take scoping into account and
>> will undeploy a 'random' context.
>>
>> Carlo
>>
>> On 01/12/2010 01:52 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> The initial runs on Hudson show no success. After a couple of
>>> deployments it goes poof with the following error:
>>>
>>>