This works up to a certain point. Our own Hudson can't scale that high
if we all wanted to run every test suite I would want on it.
Secondly, merging in svn is a bitch and you loose information during
execution. Upgrading the svn server to 1.6 would give back some, but not
all.
Carlo
On 01/12/2010 04:17 PM, Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
A technique DML and I have enjoyed in the past is a private branch
to
hold new (potentially volatile) commits; point your private Hudson
instance to it and run the AS testsuite on your own before merging into
the mainline trunk.
S,
ALR
On 01/12/2010 10:02 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
> Am I wrong in thinking that these naming commits were introduced to
> trunk/ (because Hudson caught it)? If so, you really can't be
> introducing errors like this. Such fundamental changes need to go
> through the automated test cycle before they are committed. Otherwise
> you're going to screw up everybody else that is working off of trunk.
> Especially considering every "maven install" that is done pulls in new
> snapshots.
>
> Ales Justin wrote:
>
>> Yes, like I told you n-times, the api for scoped stuff is poor atm. ;-)
>> To get around this, we used unique name and "real" alias via @Aliases
>> annotation.
>>
>> Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, BeanMetaDataDeployer.undeploy doesn't take scoping into account and
>>> will undeploy a 'random' context.
>>>
>>> Carlo
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2010 01:52 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>>> The initial runs on Hudson show no success. After a couple of
>>>> deployments it goes poof with the following error:
>>>>
>>>>
>