Re: [jboss-dev] jgroups version names

Trustin, You may be thinking of the cumulative patch versioning convention, X.Y.Z.ABC_CPnn, e.g.: 4.0.5.GA_CP08 Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > No, it's, X.Y.Z.SP1, X.Y.Z.SP2, ... > > SP comes after GA alphabetically, so we are safe. > > Trustin Lee wrote: >> I thought it was X.Y.Z.GA_SP1 and X.Y.Z.GA_SP2 according to the recent >> discussion, no? I also find GA_SPn has a clearer meaning. >> >> 2008-03-04 (화), 14:41 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis 쓰시길: >>> I think the existing internal versioning scheme of jgroups is fine, >>> I'm just asking for consistency when putting the binaries in the >>> repositories, e.g. >>> >>> X.Y.Z.Beta1 >>> X.Y.Z.Beta2 >>> X.Y.Z.CR1 >>> X.Y.Z.CR2 >>> X.Y.Z.CR3 >>> X.Y.Z.CR4 >>> X.Y.Z.GA >>> X.Y.Z.SP1 >>> X.Y.Z.SP2 >>> >>> Bela Ban wrote: >>>> Okay, well some releases are adhering to this standard... :-) >>>> >>>> I didn't care much for this because it is stupid. Relying on >>>> strings for version comparison is terrible, as we have to parse the >>>> strings into component parts (numbers) anyway. Plus we end up with >>>> kludges like changing RC1 to CR1 so alphabetical ordering still >>>> works ... >>>> >>>> A much better way, and that's what I thought we had adopted, is the >>>> scheme suggested by Scott in >>>> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77231. >>>> This allows us to use shorts for major, minor and patch versions, >>>> and comparisons become simple. >>>> >>>> Note that we don't care about comparisons between 2.6.2.CR1 and >>>> 2.6.2.GA, because the scheme suggested by Scott doesn't care about >>>> the qualifier. These 2 versions are both the same the point of the >>>> version number. >>>> >>>> Having said that, if this cannot convince you, I can adhere to the >>>> version numbering scheme, that's not an issue for me, as the >>>> underlying version stays the same, it is just the strig that changes >>>> >>>> >>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote: >>>>> - You're missing some '.GA' suffixes (e.g. 2.5.2 in both repos, >>>>> 2.6.2 maven only) >>>>> - Some versions appear both with & without the '.GA' suffix (e.g. >>>>> latest 2.6.2 in the legacy repo) >>>>> - In some cases using '-' instead of '.' (e.g. 2.5.0-GA, maven repo) >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jboss-development mailing list >>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jboss-development mailing list >>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development