Most of the failures are configuration issues... I have fixed most of
them on my local branch 4.2.
There are few tests that don't make a lot of sense (expecting some
behavior specific to JbossMQ) and there is some config on security that
needs to be fixed.
I will be fixing that next week. It won't be a lot of work as I have
already done a lot while installing JBM into 4.2 into my local copy.
Sacha Labourey wrote:
OK, great, thanks Scott.
Now, project leads, if your project is mentioned below, you know what's
on your plate. We want 0 problem in this testsuite, otherwise, we send
you "the cleaner" aka "Build Burke", and he will take care of your
project.
Onto 5.0!!!!!
On 07/13/2007 06:06 PM, Rajesh Rajasekaran wrote:
> Now we have the testsuite running to completion with Scott’s fixes
> yesterday.
>
>
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-head-testsuite-sun-1.5/...
>
>
>
>
> Summary:
>
> **Tests Failures Errors Success rate**
>
> 3302 167 308 85.61%
>
>
>
> Some of the broad categories to start looking at:
>
>
>
> Clustering: 110 failures
>
>
>
> JBoss Messaging: 49 failures
>
>
>
> Jboss web: 34 failures
>
>
>
> Deployers: 25 failures
>
>
>
> JBoss MX: 27 failures
>
>
>
> Classloader: 16 failures
>
>
>
> Jacc: 14 failures
>
>
>
> Profileservice: 13 failures
>
>
>
> Security: 12 failures
>
>
>
> Jca: 12 failures
>
>
>
> Jaxr: 9 failures
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* thecore-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:thecore-bounces@redhat.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Andrig T Miller
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 12, 2007 4:39 PM
> *To:* Sacha Labourey
> *Cc:* rcampbel(a)redhat.com; The Core; bill(a)jboss.org
> *Subject:* Re: Community
>
>
>
> If you guys want, I can open the JIRA's for the failing tests, since I
> poor over the build logs for the e-mail I have sent out the last two
> Monday's anyway. The only thing I will need some help with is how I
> determine who to assign it too. Is there something in the build log I
> can key off of for specific tests?
>
> Andy
>
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:27 +0200, Sacha Labourey wrote:
>
>
>
> Whatever is the solution, who is responsible for this? who is stepping
> up to get back to an healthy point, we are not going to go anywhere with
> 5.0 unless this is fixed, now.
>
>
>