Facelets uses JDK logging as well, but it doesn't ship with AS.
However, because it is so common, I have bridge code in there to handle
Facelets loggers in the same manner as JSF.
So all the code for the logging bridges can go away now?
Will the mapping of log levels between Log4J and JUL remain the same as
specified here?
http://www.jboss.org/community/docs/DOC-10379
Stan
David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 02/19/2009 01:34 PM, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On 02/04/2009 01:50 PM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> Project Leads,
>>
>> The next planned AS release is 5.1 Beta which we are targeting for a
>> March release, and a following GA in April (provided no major
>> problems).
>
> Here's the deal with logging.
>
> From a features perspective, there's two major pieces being
> developed. The first is getting JDK logging integrated nicely with
> the rest of the AS. This feature will be done for 5.1 *no matter
> what* - this week if I can help it - and it will involve a "fixed"
> JDK logmanager as well as a JDK-log4j bridge component.
This part is done. If you have components using JDK logging (JSF is
the only one I know of for sure), please make sure everything looks
right, and bask in the awesomeness of having your logging work -
finally :)
- DML