Re: [jboss-dev] Reverted VFS to 2.2.0.M1 (& hudson madness)
VFS 2.2.0.M1 has .war cleanup bug
VFS 2.2.0.M2 has TS issues + Iterator.remove bug
VFS 2.2.0.M3 has TS issues
Seam-int 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT excludes plugins/*.jar from scan
If you could wait for some VFS 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT from Jason
(it depends how fast he can provide it)
that would be the best choice.
Otherwise do your pick. :-)
Shelly McGowan wrote:
Ales,
So, we want to test with VFS 2.2.0.M1 and seam-int 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
Shelly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ales Justin" <ales.justin(a)gmail.com>
To: "JBoss.org development list" <jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:13:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] Reverted VFS to 2.2.0.M1 (& hudson madness)
Can we also change the Seam-int to 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT?
(Or Shelly, you already did this?)
This should fix the performance issue EmbJopr is having with
VFSScanner going "into" plugins/*.jar files.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Since this weekends hudson meltdown seems likely related to a memory
> leak, I have reverted VFS to M1. Recent updates to the VFS have been
> observed to leak (JBAS-6805). This is potentially caused by a thread
> safety issue introduced in M2. Shelly has kicked off another 5.1 testrun
> with this update, and is checking to see see if M1 resolved 6805.
>
> In the meantime I am working on an update to the VFS that does not have
> the recent TS issues.
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development