Re: [jboss-dev] jgroups version names

No, it's, X.Y.Z.SP1, X.Y.Z.SP2, ... SP comes after GA alphabetically, so we are safe. Trustin Lee wrote: > I thought it was X.Y.Z.GA_SP1 and X.Y.Z.GA_SP2 according to the recent > discussion, no? I also find GA_SPn has a clearer meaning. > > 2008-03-04 (화), 14:41 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis 쓰시길: >> I think the existing internal versioning scheme of jgroups is fine, >> I'm just asking for consistency when putting the binaries in the >> repositories, e.g. >> >> X.Y.Z.Beta1 >> X.Y.Z.Beta2 >> X.Y.Z.CR1 >> X.Y.Z.CR2 >> X.Y.Z.CR3 >> X.Y.Z.CR4 >> X.Y.Z.GA >> X.Y.Z.SP1 >> X.Y.Z.SP2 >> >> Bela Ban wrote: >>> Okay, well some releases are adhering to this standard... :-) >>> >>> I didn't care much for this because it is stupid. Relying on >>> strings for version comparison is terrible, as we have to parse the >>> strings into component parts (numbers) anyway. Plus we end up with >>> kludges like changing RC1 to CR1 so alphabetical ordering still >>> works ... >>> >>> A much better way, and that's what I thought we had adopted, is the >>> scheme suggested by Scott in >>> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77231. >>> This allows us to use shorts for major, minor and patch versions, >>> and comparisons become simple. >>> >>> Note that we don't care about comparisons between 2.6.2.CR1 and >>> 2.6.2.GA, because the scheme suggested by Scott doesn't care about >>> the qualifier. These 2 versions are both the same the point of the >>> version number. >>> >>> Having said that, if this cannot convince you, I can adhere to the >>> version numbering scheme, that's not an issue for me, as the >>> underlying version stays the same, it is just the strig that changes >>> >>> >>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote: >>>> - You're missing some '.GA' suffixes (e.g. 2.5.2 in both repos, >>>> 2.6.2 maven only) >>>> - Some versions appear both with & without the '.GA' suffix (e.g. >>>> latest 2.6.2 in the legacy repo) >>>> - In some cases using '-' instead of '.' (e.g. 2.5.0-GA, maven repo) >>>> >>>> Am I missing something? >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-development mailing list >> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-development mailing list >> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development