He's asking if we can replace
AS system-jmx's org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx
*
Adrian,
I don't understand your question regarding 4)
On 18 Jan 2010, at 18:51, Ales Justin wrote:
> I see I actually never updated @Jmx to integration::annotations. :-(
> Emanuel what's the status of integration project (in/wrt AS trunk)?
>
> Afaik, (4) should be fine when replaced.
>
> Adrian Brock wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 11:33 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
>>> The mc-jmx-int and deployers-jmx stuff was only in the 2.2.x branches
>>> of the MC projects. Now that you've upgraded trunk to those versions it
>>> should be a lot easier to use the external versions.
>>>
>>> ejb3 was already using it.
>>>
>>> I'll test it, and change trunk to use them. Then we can remove the
>>> duplicate code from system-jmx.
>> This is in now.
>> There's only four pieces left in system-jmx:
>> 1) org.jboss.deployment
>> This is the legacy MainDeployer api
>> 2) org.jboss.system.deployers.managed
>> I think this should be in deployers-jmx
>> but it has a dependency on the profile service?
>> 3) org.jboss.system.pm
>> This has a dependency on ServerConfig.
>> If the configuration was injected this could
>> move to jmx-mc-int
>> 4) org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx
>> I think this should replaced with jmx-aop-mc-int
>> Kabir, is that correct?
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Adrian Brock
>>> Chief Scientist
>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development