These are good points.
With regard to the application stack war. For us, getting all our
frameworks/products/projects to play well with each other will be a huge advantage. We
are well along with this effort.
We need to keep going and identify hubs in the product/project world to drive it forward.
For example, Infinispan/JCloud could be the hub for products/projects becoming
"cloudy". Seam could be the integration point for integration with web apps.
ESB for services. Andiamo (AKA Teiid, AKA Metamatrix) for data exchange.
For the near future there is a lot of functionality that can be created just by making
integration of frameworks easier.
Robb Greathouse
JBoss
CELL 505-507-4906
OFFICE 505-255-2652
FAX 505-554-2834
----- "Trustin Lee (이희승)" <trustin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
> And bean validation and jsf2. In and by themselves these specs are a
leap
> forward our current stack (and everybody else's). And for the first
time
> these specs (jpa 2, jsf 2, bv, cdi) have been designed to actually
work
> naturally as a unified whole.
> The framework war is over, welcome to the application stack war.
As long as the frameworks are part of the stack and users have access
to them, the frameworks matter IMHO, especially when it comes to API
design and usability. Two frameworks or libraries with same feature
set and different APIs can make a huge difference. It's something
like we say we can't tell the quality of software by the number of
ticked check boxes.
But, I do agree with you the application stack matters a LOT, too. :)
— Trustin Lee,
http://gleamynode.net/
> On 12 sept. 2009, at 09:15, Max Rydahl Andersen
<max.andersen(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> JPA2, CDI/WebBeans and JBoss Embedded is not enough for you ? ;)
>
> /max
>
> Robb Greathouse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am putting together a workshop for JBoss AS 5.x. I am looking for
some
> real wow factors. And frankly, even after talking to the core
developers
> (who agree) I am not finding any wow factors.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Robb Greathouse
> JBoss
> CELL 505-507-4906
> OFFICE 505-255-2652
> FAX 505-554-2834
> SKYPE rgreathouse
>
>
>
>
> ----- "Shelly McGowan" <smcgowan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jason,
>
>
> RE:
>
>
> Also, let me know if you have a component you would like to
> update/include that has low impact.
>
>
> jboss-test and jboss-server-manager currently include alpha
releases;
> specifically,
>
> <groupId>org.jboss.test</groupId>
> <artifactId>jboss-test</artifactId>
> <version>1.1.5-alpha-2</version>
>
> <groupId>org.jboss.jbossas</groupId>
> <artifactId>jboss-server-manager</artifactId>
> <version>1.0.3-alpha-2</version>
>
>
> These were needed as part of ALRs new bootstrap implementation
> (JBASM-30, JBASM-31). Are these alpha versions acceptable
> for the Beta1 release or would you prefer .GA?
>
>
> Shelly
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development