Re: [jboss-dev] JMX stuff WAS Re: M2 planning and timeline

It would be interesting to see if their is any performance difference using our or JDK's mbeanserver implementation.

Adrian Brock wrote: > I changed trunk to use the external JBossMX last February. > > There was a release of Beta2 in March which was mainly > a tidyup release. > > Anil's fix was in May. but since he hasn't created a JBMX jira for > his fix is doesn't appear on that project's roadmap. > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid... > > I'll do a Beta3 release for that. > > The mc-jmx-int and deployers-jmx stuff was only in the 2.2.x branches > of the MC projects. Now that you've upgraded trunk to those versions it > should be a lot easier to use the external versions. > > ejb3 was already using it. > > I'll test it, and change trunk to use them. Then we can remove the > duplicate code from system-jmx. > > The only additional issue is whether we still want to use the JBossMX > mbeanserver now that I have a way to use the JDK's MBeanServer. > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMX-11 > We could keep the choice, since its just a case of > changing the MBeanServerBuilder system property. > > We still need the j2se and mbeans stuff for the legacy XMBean support. > > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 11:34 +0100, Ales Justin wrote: >>> Are we going to do a new release of the org.jboss.mx artifacts (AS is >>> currently using 6.0.0.Beta1)? >> Does this mean we're using our externalized JBossMX? >> Afaik, we're not yet ready to switch AS to use externalized version. >> * >> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-December/015142.html >> >> Adrian? >> _______________________________________________ >> jboss-development mailing list >> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development