We also used to get e-mails addressed to us directly after hudson runs
where we'd made commits. I no longer get those, except for from ejb3.
They're useful because I filter them differently from the barrage of
other hudson emails and pay more attention.
Paul Gier wrote:
I'm doing some refactoring on the testsuite to remove the need
for
thirdparty, so some of the recent failures are my fault. I'll try to
fix those asap.
It would be helpful if Hudson was a little more reliable. It seems like
about half the Hudson jobs I kick off for the AS testsuite build end up
failing randomly (failed svn checkout, out out memory, etc). I don't
know if there is a way to improve this, but it would make testing a lot
easier.
Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> The AS TestSuite in trunk has again gotten out of line. I've got a
> 4100+ line patch coming in, and need to be able to spot potential
> regressions reliably.
>
> We need to stress the importance of checking up on your commits to
> ensure they don't bring the house down. Would like to see:
>
> 1) More self-imposed responsibility, looking after the builds in
> Hudson if you've made commits to trunk recently
> 2) More rollbacks / notices in case of regression. "Hey Jim you broke
> it fix it. Love, Me".
> 3) Maybe an appointed "watchdog" each week to act as TestSuite
> gatekeeper in case 1 and 2 /fail.
>
> S,
> ALR
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss by Red Hat