Adrian,
I don't understand your question regarding 4)
On 18 Jan 2010, at 18:51, Ales Justin wrote:
I see I actually never updated @Jmx to integration::annotations. :-(
Emanuel what's the status of integration project (in/wrt AS trunk)?
Afaik, (4) should be fine when replaced.
Adrian Brock wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 11:33 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
>> The mc-jmx-int and deployers-jmx stuff was only in the 2.2.x branches
>> of the MC projects. Now that you've upgraded trunk to those versions it
>> should be a lot easier to use the external versions.
>>
>> ejb3 was already using it.
>>
>> I'll test it, and change trunk to use them. Then we can remove the
>> duplicate code from system-jmx.
> This is in now.
> There's only four pieces left in system-jmx:
> 1) org.jboss.deployment
> This is the legacy MainDeployer api
> 2) org.jboss.system.deployers.managed
> I think this should be in deployers-jmx
> but it has a dependency on the profile service?
> 3) org.jboss.system.pm
> This has a dependency on ServerConfig.
> If the configuration was injected this could
> move to jmx-mc-int
> 4) org.jboss.system.microcontainer.jmx
> I think this should replaced with jmx-aop-mc-int
> Kabir, is that correct?
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Adrian Brock
>> Chief Scientist
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development