I have no need for more Maven babysitting. In essence AS is requesting
specific releases for each component anyway, so you might as well
request a specific snapshot release instead. So instead of
jboss-jpa-deployers-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT request
jboss-jpa-deployers-1.0.0-20090219.115639-7. That's how I triangulated
the VFS version.
The only problem is that a snapshot has transitive dependencies on other
snapshots. I started on a 'generate release pom' plugin, but Maven has
got some pretty weird notions around snapshots, so it's not going anywhere.
Carlo
Ales Justin wrote:
I'm fine with temp releases, as it's quite easy to do this
once you
have your project fully mavenized.
But we need some common/general consensus on how this is gonna be done.
Perhaps Alpha, Beta are not the way to go, as we already treat them as
"official" releases.
What is 'normally' used in this case?
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> We need to stop using snapshots in this Branch, as it's making it
> difficult for everyone to figure out why their tests are suddenly
> breaking. As an example, Brian is now trying to find the cause of a
> deadlock issue that just appeared on a testrun without any changes
> occuring.
>
> We need to use releases so that a test run can be correlated to a
> component change. Even if you don't call it an official release, just
> make up something like M132 or Beta17, etc.
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development