Previous discussion (one of many):
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2007-July/010327.html
or this rant :-)
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-1796
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 10:33 -0500, Andrig Miller wrote:
I was going to start a thread on one of the design forums but there
isn't an overall AS design forum, so I'm posting to the dev list
instead.
We have been having a discussion within the TDM's about documenting
the public vs. "private" API's. The problem we continue to have is
customers start using API's that are usually, but not always,
third-party libraries that are used as implementation details for an
API we do mean for them to use. Of course, then they start asking for
support of that usage.
As this discussion took place internally, we starting batting around
the idea of separately all the things we would like to be private into
its own lib directory. So having one lib directory where have all the
API's that we intend to have customers/users use, and one where we
have everything else, so we can clearly communicate what should be
used and what shouldn't be used directly.
What do you guys think? Is this even possible?
Andy
--
Andrig (Andy) Miller
VP of Engineering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx