Re: [jboss-dev] Re: Fwd: AS 5 Beta 2 Discussion

No, it does not, just a supportable release. We actually cannot call our EJB 3 final in AS 4.2, due to the licensing issues. The only final will be in AS 5. Andy On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 18:05 -0600, Galder Zamarreno wrote: > Does this mean there’ll be a final EJB3 release for AS 4.2? > > Galder Zamarreño > Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > IT executives: Red Hat still #1 for value http://www.redhat.com/ > promo/vendor/ > > > From:jboss-development-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:jboss- > development-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Andrig T Miller > Sent: 29 November 2006 23:05 > To: Scott M Stark > Cc: Scott M Stark; JBoss.org development list; JavaEE-TCK; Ivelin > Ivanov > Subject: [jboss-dev] Re: Fwd: AS 5 Beta 2 Discussion > > > > > I agree. In fact, we specifically created 4.2 for these types of > issues. With the inclusion of EJB 3 in 4.2 as fully supported > technology, we should make this as clean as possible. > > Andy > > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:11 -0800, Scott M Stark wrote: > > > Yes, its work to align the remoting uses. This has to be done for > jboss5, and ejb3 pulls this issue into 4.2. I don't see keeping the > legacy remoting layers as default as beneficial for 4.2. > > Tom Elrod wrote: > >> 2. A related issue is alignment on jboss-remoting transports. > There was > >> a jira issue to make the pooled invoker the default. The real > question > >> is why don't we move to the unified invoker based on remoting > to align > >> the transports between 4.2/5/ejb3. > > > > I was thinking the main reason we didn't switch to using unified > > invokers for 4.x was due to needing to update docs and training > > materials (since config would be completely different). > However, if > > this is not an issue and would prefer to switch default to be > unified > > invoker for 4.2, the change to standardjboss.xml, jboss- > service.xml, > > and cluster-service.xml is simple (but still have the issue of > where > > else needs to be changed, such as client user tx, testsuite, jmx > > invoker, etc.). > > Andrig (Andy) Miller > VP, Engineering > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > > > > > > Andrig (Andy) Miller VP, Engineering JBoss, a division of Red Hat