Why would this be weird? .com/EAP 4.x has a "production" profile that .org/AS
4.x does not...
David
Jason T. Greene wrote:
Part of the problem is that EAP is planning on including a JBM2
profile
/ option. IMO it would be very weird to ship something in EAP but not in
AS. Besides creating a profile, another option we have is to include
JBM2 with an install script in docs/examples. Then someone could switch
any AS profile to JBM2.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> We have enough configurations so far, so I don't think it's a good
> idea adding any new ones until we come up with with a way to share
> most of the jars/configuration.
>
> In your case it's better to offer the preview as a separate download.
>
> Andy Taylor wrote:
>> As part of the AS 5.1 release we will be shipping JBM 2.0 as a
>> technology preview. This will require 1 or more new profiles to be
>> created. I have created a branch (Branch_5_x_JBM2) to use for now
>> which i will merge in once JBM 2.0 is released and there is something
>> concrete and working.
>>
>> What new profiles we need to add is open to discussion. We'll
>> definitely need a copy of default as a start which could be called
>> messaging-2. However, from a JBM2 point of view, it would be good to
>> also demonstrate clustering which would mean a copy of all, say
>> messaging-2-all, and since JBM2 can run with a minimal set of
>> services maybe a messaging-2-minimal as well.
>>
>> I appreciate that adding all 3 might be too many new profiles to add
>> so I'd like to hear peoples views!
>>
>> Andy Taylor Core Developer
>> JBoss Messaging
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development