The jboss-common-core-2.0.4.GA style tag is what maven release wants to
use. I have been overriding this to just the number since the project
name is already in the svn url.
We do need to pull the logging project out since jira does not have
subproject notions. We need to move forward with merging the arjuna
logging and internationalization work into the logging project before
deciding on whether it can be consolidated.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
We have 2 branches from the old common that included logging:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/common-old/branches/
Branch_1_0 for AS 4.0.x (latest release, 1.0.4.GA)
Branch_1_2 for AS 4.2.x (latest release, 1.2.0.GA)
Those are tagged the old way and tracked in JIRA.
For the new common (minus logging) we have again 2 branches:
This was created recently, but is it actually used?
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/common-core/branches/2_0/
We have different type of tags (is this a maven thing?):
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/common-core/tags/2.0.5.GA/
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/common-core/tags/jboss-common-core-2.0...
But 2.0.5.GA still looks unreleased in JIRA:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=12310265
2.0.2 and 2.0.3 were skipped in JIRA.
The common-core trunk is now producing the 2.2.x versions:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/common/common-core/trunk/
Last ones were 2.2.0.GA, 2.2.1.GA. Only the second was registered in JIRA.
Now that common-core has moved to 2.2.x, we have the problem that the
logging modules are still in 2.0.x version so the COMMON JIRA cannot
track now updates to both:
common-logging-jdk
common-logging-log4j
common-logging-spi
Commong-logging has tags that are not documented and don't know if/where
are used
2.0.3.GA/
jboss-common-logging-spi-2.0.4.GA/
AS5 is no on 2.0.2.GA
So
0) We need to do a better job tracking common-core/logging in JIRA,
otherwise we won't know what a particular version contains.
1) Shouldn't we create a different project in jira for Common Logging?
2) Since the 3 logging modules move in tandem and not too often, does it
make sense to move them in a single project, rather than having to
maintain 3 different projects?
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development