Running the profileservice tests with
-Djboss.vfs.cache=org.jboss.virtual.plugins.cache.WeakRefVFSCache,
the seam test times are:
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamBookingExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 24.436 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamDvdExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 16.696 sec
[junit] Test
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamDvdExampleUnitTestCase FAILED
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamJpaExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 11.985 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamNumberguessExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.289 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamVFSClassloadingUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 44.541 sec
...
Total time: 6 minutes 37 seconds
with -Djboss.vfs.cache=org.jboss.virtual.plugins.cache.TimedVFSCache
the seam test times are:
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamBookingExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 17.681 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamDvdExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 15.061 sec
[junit] Test
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamDvdExampleUnitTestCase FAILED
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamJpaExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 10.536 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamNumberguessExampleUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 8.257 sec
[junit] Running
org.jboss.test.deployers.seam.test.SeamVFSClassloadingUnitTestCase
[junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 42.076 sec
...
Total time: 6 minutes 15 seconds
So the TimedVFSCache is a little better. Can't we add a
VFSCacheFactory.getInstance(String defaultCache) so that the cache can
be set in the initialize.xml rather than having to update every startup
config to pass in a system property.
Stan Silvert wrote:
Can we go ahead and make a decision on this? It's holding up
Seam
testing.
Ales Justin wrote:
> As we don't vote or go 'with it w/o reason' (Adrian's rules) ;-)
> I'll explain a bit my options:
>
>> - (1) + proper strong ref on this:
>>
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=145039
>
> We keep the most used one's via strong ref on VFSInitializer,
> but let other temps be GCed asap.
>
>> - (4) with limit long enough to do common apps deployment triggered
>> upon this cache
>
> We make the timed limit long enough that most of apps make advantage
> of this vfs cache,
> once initialization period is over, flush it all.
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development