Re: [jboss-dev] Naming over Remoting 3
One observation that's neither here nor there - ALR has been kicking around
a "back to basics" simple invocation mechanism that should work for all
Things That Call Remote Methods Via a Proxy (tm), for EJB3 and whatever
else it may apply to, which opens the possibility to come up with a
standard Remoting 3 invocation service of some sort.
It looks pretty good to me so far. It lives here:
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/common/invokablecontainer/trunk/api/
Granted realistically this is going to apply more to what we stick *in*
JNDI, than how JNDI is itself implemented (which, afaict, -could- just be a
straight-up Remoting 3 service type, though that'd be a more significant
departure from the current implementation from what I understand of it,
than sticking with something more RMI-like).
- DML
On 11/18/2009 07:42 PM, Ron Sigal wrote:
I subject has arisen in JBAS-3151 "Convert HA-JNDI stubs to
Remoting"
that Brian has suggested deserves some discussion. I've started a forum
thread
(http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4266436#...),
but here's the teaser:
*"ron" wrote:*
...
Is there anything wrong with HARMIClient and HARMIServer, other than the
fact that they depend on RMI?
---
*"brian" wrote:*
Not particularly, no. I think the main issues are 1) we want to unify as
much as possible on a single remote invocation mechanism 2) get rid of
myriad sockets opened by different services. I suppose the latter goes
beyond the description of this JIRA as it involve converting
HANamingService to use a Remoting connector instead of directly
listening on port 1101.
*"ron" wrote:*
It looks like there are two kinds of Naming listeners:
1. the "bootstrap" listeners in org.jnp.server.Main and
org.jboss.ha.jndi.HANamingService, and
2. the actual service listeners: org.jnp.server.NamingServer and
org.jboss.ha.framework.server.HARMIServerImpl
So, we'd like to replace them all with handlers on a single Remoting
connector (or, actually, the Remoting 3 version of of handlers and
connectors).
*"brian" wrote:*
The bootstrap listener part probably bears discussion on the jboss-dev
list since it much more directly impacts stuff like end-user
configuration (i.e. jndi.properties or other ways of setting the
properties passed to new InitialContext()). The service listeners are
more straightforward.
Discuss?
-Ron
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development