Re: [jboss-dev] Further profling: Where should I focus?

Let's wait for Richard confirmation (he just left), but from his commits I think at least part of the problem was basically the same Carlo's mentioned in "Re: [jboss-dev] Integration of naming deployers failed" regarding modules names that need to be unique. Cheers Alessio Brian Stansberry wrote: > Can you give an example? If there was a change in AS behavior that > forced you to change your deployments, I'd like to understand better > what the change was. > > On 01/14/2010 05:40 AM, Richard Opalka wrote: > >> I fixed the tests (to have unique archive names inside ear). >> Now all JBossWS tests pass against AS trunk, see 601 jobs at: >> >> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/ >> >> IOW MC upgrade is ok for JBossWS, no problems since now ;) >> >> Richard >> >> On 01/13/2010 03:45 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote: >> >>> If you have some spare cycles to try and analyze the cause of some of >>> those failures, it would be very helpful. If you find anything, the "MC >>> 2.2.x update" thread on this list is the best place to report them. >>> >>> On 01/13/2010 08:30 AM, Richard Opalka wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Yes, >>>> >>>> it's nice it boots faster. >>>> However there are still some issues, e.g. >>>> http://jbossws.jboss.org:8180/hudson/job/NATIVE-CORE-AS-6.0.1-SUN-JDK-6/28/ >>>> that have to be addressed/identified :( >>>> >>>> Rio >>>> >>>> > > > >