Re: [jboss-dev] Project ByteMan
Andrew, did you get around to compare ByteMan with JBoss AOP?
IMO, both seem to do the same, instrument classes to add some behaviour
here or there. ByteMan simply seems to use load time weaving style
whereas JBoss AOP had two modes.
So, why should I use ByteMan over JBoss AOP if JBoss AOP is already
integrated with AS? Easy of use? Memory consumption? Speed? Functionality?
Andrew Dinn wrote:
Hi Foax,
After several false starts and concomitant rethinks legal have finally
agreed that I can use the name ByteMan (aka JBoss ByteMan) for the tool
formerly known as TOAST. The name abbreviates 'Byte Manipulation' rather
than identifying some nerdy superhero -- although I am still toying with
the idea of presenting at Jazoon in mask, tights and cape. Mark Newton
is currently in the process of setting up a ByteMan project with
repository, forum etc. In the meantime I would like to claim the package
space org.jboss.byteman for all code products associated with the
project. I believe this does not clash with any existing code. If you
know otherwise please inform me ASAP.
regards,
Andrew Dinn
-----------
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat