Emmanuel says he is going to open one.
In fact, he says he already raised the same issue
in the forums but then forgot about it. :-)
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 12:19 +0100, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
Could you open a jira for this one and mark it as critical?
Preferably I like the test cases committed under that issue as well, but
that is water under the bridge. Or is that mustard after the cake.
Carlo
Adrian Brock wrote:
> As part of a test of this
>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6013
>
> I've created a test that uses the jboss_5_0.xsd
> for an MDB.
>
> The test works but the
> org.jboss.test.xml.DDValidatorUnitTestCase
> is saying my jboss.xml is invalid
>
> The reason is that the xsd says I can't have
> an <activation-config/> in jboss.xml
>
> This is obviously wrong since it works
> and JBossMessageDrivenMetaData has such an element.
>
> In fact, there are many things you can now have
> in jboss.xml (virtually anything from ejb-jar.xml)
> that are not listed in this schema.
>
> I'm going to commit this and leave it to somebody
> working on the metadata project to fix the schema
> and therefore the test.
>
> Using this class
>
http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/common/jbossxb/trunk/src/test/...
> with the SchemaBinding created by the schema builder
> will help in seeing the difference in the actual
> versus the documented schema.
>
> Under the new rules, I should be allowed to
> break the testsuite if it shows something is broken.
>
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development --
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx