On 10/01/2008 05:05 AM, Adrian Brock wrote:
A branch will be created for the broken build
before rolling back so the commit(s) can be fixed
and tested before re-merging.
I vote against this, if my vote counts. Just roll it back, you don't need
a branch. The original committer can use "svn merge -rXX:YY" to re-merge
the change in their local tree. We already have an awful lot of branches
as is.
- DML