The "GA" is implicit.
This way, we don't have redundant/confusing qualifiers. Our next
release will be 1.0.1. Then 1.0.2. Otherwise would we do:
1.0.0-SP1?
1.0.1-GA?
1.0.1-SP1?
..and after that:
1.0.0-SP2?
1.0.2-SP2?
So we'll continue along with the 1.0.x series, all GA, until our next
Betas are 1.1.0-Beta1, etc.
S,
ALR
Anil Saldhana wrote:
ALR, should it not be 1.0.0.GA?
Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
> Last week we did the following:
>
> * Released 1.0.0 of all EJB3 subcomponents
> * Updated the dependency chain and released jboss-ejb3-as-int:1.0.0-CR2
> * Promoted 1.0.0-CR2 to 1.0.0
> * Updated AS trunk, Branch_5_x, Branch_5_0 with EJB3 1.0.0
> * Released the EJB3 Plugin 1.0.0[1], to patch JBossAS 5.0.0.GA with
> libraries needed to bring EJB3 1.0.0 current.
> * Announced to our community[2]
>
> Looking forward we'll be pledging releases on the 2nd and 4th Fridays
> of the month. In practice we'll be starting the process on Thursdays
> to meet the deadline.
>
> For our first straight-to-community release, all went pretty smoothly.
> Still TODO in future releases:
>
> * Better integrate release process w/ JBossQA
> * Document procedures for release (ie. JBossNews updates to Twitter,
> blogs, Release Notes, README, etc)
> * Continue to chip away at "the continuous integration problem", in
> that dependency updates are all manual, there's no
> re-tagging/repackaging of CRs into GAs, and the testing process is
> much longer than we'd like.
> * Get documentation/tutorials into the picture (Jaikiran's revamped
> and updated the suite)
>
> S,
> ALR
>
> References:
>
> [1]
>
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866&package_i...
>
> [2]
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=149232
>
> Andrew Lee Rubinger wrote:
>> After the 1.0.0-GA Release of the EJB3 Projects, we will continue to
>> push releases both to the community and into AS active branches at a
>> resolution of twice a month[1]. The EJB3 Team has not yet agreed
>> upon a formal schedule (ie. every 1st and 3rd Monday will lead to
>> occasional gaps in cases where a month has 5 Mondays). After we've
>> set this, we'll reply back to this list with a commitment upon which
>> the community and dependent projects (ie. AS, WebBeans) may rely.
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Andrew Lee Rubinger
Sr. Software Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat, Inc.
http://exitcondition.alrubinger.com