Forget Tomcat4 and 5 public api for AuthenticatorBase.
They changed the API to cater to Servlet3 recently. Since
AuthenticatorBase is a
Tomcat interface, they can get away.
Server binding code is always at the risk of internal api changing over
major versions.
On 08/25/2010 06:17 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Just FYI, org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase shipped
with
JBossWeb (3.0-Beta5 and the one used in JBossAS built from the trunk) does not match
any of the Tomcat AuthenticatorBase classes documented publicly, at least since Tomcat
4.0
JBossWeb expects that an abstract AuthenticatorBase.authenticate method has the following
signature :
protected abstract boolean authenticate(org.apache.catalina.connector.Request request,
javax.servlet.HttpServletResponse response,
org.apache.catalina.deploy.LoginConfig config)
throws IOException;
cheers, Sergey
----- "Sergey Beryozkin"<sberyozk(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the links.
>
> I checked a JBossAS Tomcat integration module earlier on,
> at
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/tomcat
>
> and saw the references to jbossweb on forums, but still thought
> catalina.jar was used somehow internally, thus was curious what the
> corresponding version was.
>
> At the moment I'm just doing a 'provided' scope dependency on catalina
> 6.0.28, and I'm assuming it will just work in JBoss but I guess the
> demo will be better off with depending on jbossweb.
>
> cheers, Sergey
>
> ----- "Brian Stansberry"<brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> JBoss AS uses JBoss Web (derived from Tomcat), not Tomcat itself.
>>
>>
>
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/public-jboss/org/...
>> is the location of the version currently used in AS trunk.
>>
>>
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/trunk/component-matrix/pom.xml
> is
>> the file in the AS trunk that defines that dependency.
>>
>> On 7/15/10 10:23 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>> Well, this is quite obvious, I can quess that one :-)
>>> Which version of Catalina ? Though probably any in the 5.x range
>> will do, just not sure if AS 6.0 uses Catalina 6.x or not
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>
>>> ----- "Anil Saldhana"<Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sergey,
>>>> extend Tomcat AuthenticatorBase class for your authenticator.
>> It
>>>> should have available in the catalina jar.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>> On 07/15/2010 09:20 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>>>> Hi Anil
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- "Anil Saldhana"<Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The login modules happen late in the container security
> sequence
>>>> and
>>>>>> have limited access to the network message etc. They can only
>> say
>>>>>> yes/no to authentication. But they cannot do some of the
>> redirects
>>>> or
>>>>>> other extra steps that are needed in mechanisms outside of the
>>>> servlet
>>>>>> spec mechanisms (form, client-cert, basic,digest). SAML,
>>>>>> OpenID/OAuth
>>>>>> etc may need access to the network message (http message) and
>> may
>>>> have
>>>>>> to redirect the request to an external identity provider. In
>>>> these
>>>>>> situations, you do container integration (in the case of
> tomcat,
>> it
>>>> is
>>>>>> via authenticators).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ideally, you should be doing JSR-196 which will provide you the
>>>>>> pluggable server authentication modules and can stack modules
>> just
>>>> as
>>>>>> you do with login modules.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have support for JSR-196 in AS6 which needs to be taken
>> further
>>>>>> before EE6 certification.
>>>>>>
http://anil-identity.blogspot.com/search/label/jsr-196
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for all the info, I will experiment with Athenticators,
> no
>>>> redirection will be needed in cases where they should
>>>>> enforce that a given OAuth consumer is a valid one, but I'd like
>> to
>>>> try them too...
>>>>> How to figure out which catalina/tomcat dependency should be
> used
>>>> for writing a custom Authenticator to be used in JBossAS 6.0
>>>> deployments ?
>>>>> thanks, Sergey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07/14/2010 11:17 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For OAuth there are a few issues:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. It has specific headers.
>>>>>>>> 2. You create "secrets" on the fly which are
used to
>>>> authenticate
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> authorize requests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regarding 2: This is just one approach which the RestEasy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> oauth-push-messaging takes, but one can imagine
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the administrator registering the OAuth consumers
representing
>>>> say
>>>>>> messaging services in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe its best to first iterate on an Authenticator,
then
> move
>>>>>> logic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>> the stack once you get a prototype going? I don't
know how
>>>> Sergey
>>>>>>>> likes
>>>>>>>> to work :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, my own problem so far is that I doubt the necessity of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> introducing a role-based
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> control access in a push-messaging case given the way the
>> current
>>>>>> solution works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Specifically, a subscriber needs to grant the messaging
> service
>> a
>>>>>> permission to access a destination URI using a (domain)
>>>> admin-level
>>>>>> invocation on the message receiver; in other words the
>> subscriber
>>>> can
>>>>>> not just tell the messaging service to push to some arbitrary
>>>> server,
>>>>>> the subscriber needs to control that specific URI space on that
>>>>>> server; it is really the subscriber's space in the end of
the
>> day.
>>>>>>> So it is an admin-level decision which is enforced by the
> OAuth
>>>>>> filter anyway - by authenticating (by ensuring current OAuth
>>>> client_id
>>>>>> matches the records and checking the signature the secret) and
>>>>>> validating that the request URI matches the one specified by
> the
>>>> admin
>>>>>> (subscriber) at the previous step.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus it is not obvious to me why it is worth introducing
>> another
>>>>>> authorization layer, at least given the way the push-messaging
>>>> demo
>>>>>> works at the moment. And when I'm in doubt I'm really
working
>> very
>>>>>> slowly, sorry, probably not a good thing to say publicly :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where I can see the login modules may be introduced is when
we
>>>> have
>>>>>> OAuth consumers registered well in advance and say the
>>>> administrator
>>>>>> allocates roles to various consumers using nice UI and then we
>> have
>>>> a
>>>>>> case where some consumers may access one (resource) service
>> method
>>>> and
>>>>>> some other consumers can access some other method only. It is
>> not
>>>> the
>>>>>> case with the push-messaging demo though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cheers, Sergey
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris Bredesen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Authenticator is a Catalina/Web construct that
delegates to
> a
>>>>>> Realm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> (Catalina construct) that, in JBAS is backed by
LoginModules
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> (JAAS
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> constructs, JBoss implementations).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> JAAS LoginModules are constrained by their own API
which
>> means
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> access to only certain callbacks (username, password,
etc)
>> and
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> knowledge of the Servlet API. You can do
authentication in
>> an
>>>>>>>>> Authenticator but that's not portable to other
> non-Tomcat/JBW
>>>>>>>>> environments. The naming is a bit confusing IMO. It
made
>>>> sense
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tomcat but adds confusion in JBAS.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You don't need to worry about writing an
Authenticator
> unless
>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> access to something that you don't already get
from the
>>>> existing
>>>>>>>>> Authenticators, such as cookies, etc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -CB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 07/14/2010 10:53 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just guessing,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Isn't the login module responsible for the
actual
>>>> authentication
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> authorization? Tomcat authenticator is just
responsible
> for
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> extracting
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> header info?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You can achieve by writing a tomcat
authenticator and
>>>> putting
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WEB-INF/context.xml (JBAS) or
META-INF/context.xml
>> (tomcat).
>>>>>>>>>>>> The auth-name is a string defined in the
servlet spec.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> thanks for the tip.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What is the difference between writing a
custom Tomcat
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> authenticator and a custom LoginModule, example,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
> org.picketlink.identity.federation.bindings.jboss.auth.SAML2STSLoginModule
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My understanding is that having custom login
modules :
>>>>>>>>>>> - makes it easy to stack together
different modules,
>> as
>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for ex at [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - but requires the explicit loading of
(JBoss
>> Security)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AuthenticationManager (at least when services are POJOs)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, Sergey
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/SAMLEJBIntegrationwithPicketLinkSTS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/13/2010 11:35 AM, Bill Burke
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Remy, Anil,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I'm cc'ing jboss-dev for
archive purposes)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey , a new web services/resteasy
hire, has done some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> great
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> around OAuth lately. I'm
interested in taking his stuff
>> to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> level and make it consumable in a way
JBoss AS users are
>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuring security.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Specifically, I'm interested in
defining a OAuth
>>>>>>>>>>>>> login-config/auth-method within
web.xml i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <login-config>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<auth-name>OAuth</auth-name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<realm-name>...</realm-name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </login-config>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be an initial step,
eventually I'd like to be
>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> configure a web app to support
multiple authentication
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mechanisms,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that one URL could support both OAuth
and traditional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is JSR 196 the way to do this? Do we
support in AS6?
> Is
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doco
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> someplace? (I couldn't find with
a search).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bill