thanks a lot for looking at this. I'll take your feedback back to the
EEG, which will meet in Dublin next week.
On 07/17/2009 07:03 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
the JAAS proposal looks to be in line with the general JAAS practices
in the SE and EE world.
I had some doubts about how the Class.forName loading of the LM will
work with the OSGi Classloaders in play. But that is how the JDK loads
the modules as well in the LoginContext class. Scott, do you see any
The proposal also takes care of installing/uninstalling JAAS
configuration at deployment level. So that takes care of our needs as well.
Thomas Diesler wrote:
> Please don't forget that EEG documents can be circulated internally only.
> On 07/15/2009 10:55 AM, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Hi Scott/Anil,
>> attached is document that is currently discussed by the OSGi EEG.
>> Perhaps you like to review and provide feedback that I can take with me
>> to the next F2F in Dublin (27-29,Jul-2009).
>> Especially Section 5 (Requirements) is where we ma be able to add JBoss
>> specific requirements.
jboss-development mailing list
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
2009 Red Hat Summit and JBoss World.
Chicago. September 1-4, 2009.