"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | Which almost certainly means letting the filter implementation bubble up into the MC | with an api that is OSGi agnostic and could contain extra features when not used via the OSGi api. You could already use some sort of filter via my Matcher notion. The filter could be transformed into Matcher, which is then checked against all supplies in the KernelController. If the existing OSGi services are already registered against KC's supplies, then this (almost) falls OOTB. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4251602#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...