Re: [teiid-dev] Embedded Vs Server in the Designer
----- "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
just changing the title of the email from last one..
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 15:01 -0400, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 14:24 -0400, John Doyle wrote:
> > as part of the embedded Teiid for Designer which results from
this
> > change,
> No, this assumption is wrong. Designer can keep going on the same
path
> as today, the only thing will change in this case is to designer to
> support the both layers. Designer team was already doing the
similar
> technique for JDBC connectors from the earlier design, now, with
this
> change it will apply to all the sources.
I understood part of this proposal to be an alternative to the path designer was taking,
and addressing a lot of the complexities of that approach. Specifically that in this new
path 'preview' of physical and virtual models would be accomplished with an
embedded teiid, and that the user would "Deploy" a VDB to the container to test
a VDB via a DTP connection to Teiid. Do I understanding that your are proposing that
'preview' of models on a remote Teiid also be supported in the tooling?
~jd