No, it's, X.Y.Z.SP1, X.Y.Z.SP2, ...
SP comes after GA alphabetically, so we are safe.
Trustin Lee wrote:
I thought it was X.Y.Z.GA_SP1 and X.Y.Z.GA_SP2 according to the
recent
discussion, no? I also find GA_SPn has a clearer meaning.
2008-03-04 (화), 14:41 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis 쓰시길:
> I think the existing internal versioning scheme of jgroups is fine, I'm just
asking for
> consistency when putting the binaries in the repositories, e.g.
>
> X.Y.Z.Beta1
> X.Y.Z.Beta2
> X.Y.Z.CR1
> X.Y.Z.CR2
> X.Y.Z.CR3
> X.Y.Z.CR4
> X.Y.Z.GA
> X.Y.Z.SP1
> X.Y.Z.SP2
>
> Bela Ban wrote:
>> Okay, well some releases are adhering to this standard... :-)
>>
>> I didn't care much for this because it is stupid. Relying on strings for
>> version comparison is terrible, as we have to parse the strings into
>> component parts (numbers) anyway. Plus we end up with kludges like
>> changing RC1 to CR1 so alphabetical ordering still works ...
>>
>> A much better way, and that's what I thought we had adopted, is the
>> scheme suggested by Scott in
>>
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=77231. This
>> allows us to use shorts for major, minor and patch versions, and
>> comparisons become simple.
>>
>> Note that we don't care about comparisons between 2.6.2.CR1 and
>> 2.6.2.GA, because the scheme suggested by Scott doesn't care about the
>> qualifier. These 2 versions are both the same the point of the version
>> number.
>>
>> Having said that, if this cannot convince you, I can adhere to the
>> version numbering scheme, that's not an issue for me, as the underlying
>> version stays the same, it is just the strig that changes
>>
>>
>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> - You're missing some '.GA' suffixes (e.g. 2.5.2 in both repos,
2.6.2
>>> maven only)
>>> - Some versions appear both with & without the '.GA' suffix (e.g.
>>> latest 2.6.2 in the legacy repo)
>>> - In some cases using '-' instead of '.' (e.g. 2.5.0-GA,
maven repo)
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development