Re: [jboss-dev] Renaming server/web to server/jbossweb-standalone
The big picture is going to depend somewhat on what happens with the
profile service in AS6, however in general I would like the default
profile to be our EE6 Web Profile configuration (with some extras). I
expect this to be the most desired configuration. Standard should be
dropped as it is no longer relevant. All could remain to be what it is
today (everything including the kitchen sink).
I would have proposed dropping server/web, but Remy is using it right
now for his jbossweb servlet 3 distro.
Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
I think it would help to explain overall what you would like to see
as
the supported profile/configurations in AS6 (or later) so that we get
the big picture.
E.g. in another thread I had suggested a possibility to simplify things:
0) remove 'minimal', or make it more like an empty osgi container
1) 'default' merged with 'standard' and certified for full EE compliance
(at some point), configured for development.
2) 'web' certified for EE web-profile compliance, configured for
development.
3) 'all' an extension of 'default' configured for development
Now whether to have a more lightweight 'jbossweb' or just reuse the
'web' one, I think we should hear from Remy, too.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
> In order to prevent confusion between server/web and the EE web
> profile, I would like to rename server/web to be jbossweb-standalone,
> since this is what it is currently being used for.
>
> Any objections?
>
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat