Re: [jboss-dev] Renaming server/web to server/jbossweb-standalone

The big picture is going to depend somewhat on what happens with the profile service in AS6, however in general I would like the default profile to be our EE6 Web Profile configuration (with some extras). I expect this to be the most desired configuration. Standard should be dropped as it is no longer relevant. All could remain to be what it is today (everything including the kitchen sink). I would have proposed dropping server/web, but Remy is using it right now for his jbossweb servlet 3 distro. Dimitris Andreadis wrote: > I think it would help to explain overall what you would like to see as > the supported profile/configurations in AS6 (or later) so that we get > the big picture. > > E.g. in another thread I had suggested a possibility to simplify things: > > 0) remove 'minimal', or make it more like an empty osgi container > 1) 'default' merged with 'standard' and certified for full EE > compliance (at some point), configured for development. > 2) 'web' certified for EE web-profile compliance, configured for > development. > 3) 'all' an extension of 'default' configured for development > > Now whether to have a more lightweight 'jbossweb' or just reuse the > 'web' one, I think we should hear from Remy, too. > > Jason T. Greene wrote: >> In order to prevent confusion between server/web and the EE web >> profile, I would like to rename server/web to be jbossweb-standalone, >> since this is what it is currently being used for. >> >> Any objections? >>