Thomas' changes on this build were only testsuite ones, and the previous build before
that
succeeded.
It's a deadlock because we cannot release without a fixed VFS, while
"fixing" VFS breaks
other stuff so we cannot release :)
Adrian Brock wrote:
That's a strange definition of a deadlock. :-)
Either the problems are in Ales's VFS changes or
they are somewhere else.
Rolling back the other changes and re-applying Ales's changes should
tell you which is true.
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:37 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> The main purpose of the release is to fix the tmp file handling by VFS. Ales'
changes are
> supposed to do that, although they break other things.
>
> As it is now we are deadlocked.
>
> Adrian Brock wrote:
>> If its broken just roll it back.
>>
>> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 13:48 +0200, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>> Nobody?
>>>
>>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-test...
>>>
>>> Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
>>>> While Ales is fighting the VFS beast for the 5.0.1 release we need help
>>>> to qualify and resolve the testsuite and tck regression.
>>>>
>>>>
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/JBoss%20AS/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-test...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The majority of the failures seem to be deployment/classloader related.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> /D
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jboss-development mailing list
>>> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development