I'm planning on leaving the old stuff where it is in the short term. Maybe when
I have some free time I can relocate it properly.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
OK. I will start putting everything there. Is there a plan to
relocate
everything under jboss, or are we going to leave those versions around
for backwards compatibility?
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 20:25 -0500, Paul Gier wrote:
> I'd like to follow the maven conventions and put projects under the groupId of
> "org.jboss.<project>". Basically the base package name of the
classes should be
> used as the groupId.
>
> The projects that are under groupId "jboss" is how we were doing it
before.
>
>
> Jason T. Greene wrote:
>> Looking at our maven repository, their seems to be a large variety of
>> conventions on where to put packages. Even the same package exists in
>> multiple locations.
>>
>> Has it been decided where packages are supposed to be?
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development