Agree, but this should include all classes/interfaces in a javaee x
release so its clear what the contract for that version is. Right now
its spread across the projects with the deployer/container.
Carlo de Wolf wrote:
Put them in a separate project, so we can binary import them both in
AS
4.x and AS 5.x. I've got a mavenized ejb3x in AS trunk/projects.
Carlo
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 09:10 -0500, Bill Burke wrote:
> ejb3x should really be a javaee5.jar
>
> that includes all the new javaee5 interfaces, etc.
>