There are other schemas besides XSD, e.g. relaxng, that are more
flexible in structures.
But JAXB annotations are based on XSD and this is what XB is limited to
(with some extensions).
Anil Saldhana wrote:
Ales, just attend one of interoperability events involving a flavor
of
xml and you will realize the value of schema validation.
We need to maintain proper order based on schema IMO.
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
> Because you have a schema and in the schema you use sequences. If you
> want, use xsd:all instead I don't mind (although it has limitations).
>
> XML must be valid and Java binding consistent with schemas. Or you can
> take over metadata :)
>
> Ales Justin wrote:
>> Why is actually order so important?
>>
>> I for one don't care how MC beans are described.
>> Or any other xml for that matter.
>>
>> I would say just the contrary,
>> while I remember what are some elements and attributes
>> I will never remember the right order.
>> And if I don't have some fancy IDE, e.g. plain notepad or joe,
>> it's like a lottery to get it right. :-)
>>
>> Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
>>> David M. Lloyd wrote:
>>>> So for those of us who are mostly JAXB-ignorant - if I give
>>>> propOrder={} this means that no additional order (beyond what's in
>>>> the XSD, if validation is enabled) will be enforced, right? So I
>>>> should be adding this to every XmlType in my MC metadata class
>>>> definitions?
>>>
>>> Yes, propOrder should match the order in the XSD. And, of course,
>>> XML should follow the same order.
>>>
>>> Make sure it's all consistent before the next release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alexey
_______________________________________________
jboss-development mailing list
jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development