Re: [jboss-dev] Can I get rid of org.jboss.mq.server.jmx
Sorry, I focused on the *MO classes part of your message and ignored the
primary topic!
I don't see any reason AS 6 should support -service.xml deployments that
use the old JBoss MQ classes. I recommend you give it a few days in case
there are other opinions, and if not get rid of them when you start work
on this.
Another question though is whether we should provide a similar
compatibility layer for legacy -service.xml JBM deployments. Thoughts
anyone?
On 01/08/2010 02:55 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
See my post on your thread. Most of that stuff is the ProfileService
integration with messaging and needs to be adapted to work with HornetQ.
Without it configuration changes made through the console will not work,
nor will creating queues and topics from the console.
Emanuel Muckenhuber and I can get into further details on the forum thread.
On 01/08/2010 02:51 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> I'm currently working on the integration of HornetQ on AS6.
>
> There are a few classes on the messaging project, that I will probably
> remove everything. I'm going to replace it for something more abstract
> as I started a discussion here:
>
> http://community.jboss.org/thread/146565?tstart=0
>
>
>
> However, I just realized that there are a few org.jboss.mq.server.jmx
> classes that are just delegating to JBM 1.4.
>
>
> I want to get rid of all that. Any objections?
>
>
>
> also... There are a couple *MO classes. (ManagedObjectDefinition)
>
>
> I couldn't find much information about this. Is there a project for
> this? Maybe I'm getting old and not being able to google properly, or
> it's just a new project or something like that?
>
>
>
> clebert
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss by Red Hat