Re: [jboss-dev] JBoss_5_0.xsd is wrong

Adrian (or anybody who may know), what is the difference between activation-config and default-activation-config (which is defined in jboss_5_0.xsd for message-driven bean type)? Do we have to have both or can we choose just one? Thanks, Alexey Adrian Brock wrote: > As part of a test of this > https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6013 > > I've created a test that uses the jboss_5_0.xsd > for an MDB. > > The test works but the > org.jboss.test.xml.DDValidatorUnitTestCase > is saying my jboss.xml is invalid > > The reason is that the xsd says I can't have > an <activation-config/> in jboss.xml > > This is obviously wrong since it works > and JBossMessageDrivenMetaData has such an element. > > In fact, there are many things you can now have > in jboss.xml (virtually anything from ejb-jar.xml) > that are not listed in this schema. > > I'm going to commit this and leave it to somebody > working on the metadata project to fix the schema > and therefore the test. > > Using this class > http://viewvc.jboss.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/common/jbossxb/trunk/src/test/... > with the SchemaBinding created by the schema builder > will help in seeing the difference in the actual > versus the documented schema. > > Under the new rules, I should be allowed to > break the testsuite if it shows something is broken. _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development