But it probably doesn't help. :-)
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 13:35 +0100, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Adrian (or anybody who may know),
what is the difference between activation-config and
default-activation-config (which is defined in jboss_5_0.xsd for
message-driven bean type)? Do we have to have both or can we choose just
Adrian Brock wrote:
> As part of a test of this
> I've created a test that uses the jboss_5_0.xsd
> for an MDB.
> The test works but the
> is saying my jboss.xml is invalid
> The reason is that the xsd says I can't have
> an <activation-config/> in jboss.xml
> This is obviously wrong since it works
> and JBossMessageDrivenMetaData has such an element.
> In fact, there are many things you can now have
> in jboss.xml (virtually anything from ejb-jar.xml)
> that are not listed in this schema.
> I'm going to commit this and leave it to somebody
> working on the metadata project to fix the schema
> and therefore the test.
> Using this class
> with the SchemaBinding created by the schema builder
> will help in seeing the difference in the actual
> versus the documented schema.
> Under the new rules, I should be allowed to
> break the testsuite if it shows something is broken.
jboss-development mailing list
JBoss, a division of Red Hat